Visit John Lam's column >>

JOHN LAMHome Page

from the underground
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 33
Member Since: 3/2007Last Seen: 9/29/2009

High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi

advertisement

Tests on sushi bought in Manhattan revealed mercury levels that exceed accepted safety standards.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":1391762,"authorDomain":"johnlam"}

Never mind recent scares about protein enhancers in dog food imported from China. By far, most foods for dogs and people are safe. In contrast, recent test found levels of mercury in bluefin tuna exceeding one part per million, a level set by the Food & Drug Administration for potential bans. The warning issued in 2004 for women and children to limit their intake of canned tuna had not included fresh tuna. It caused a great stir and debate over the merits of eating more omega-3 fatty acids versus eating less mercury. Now fresh bluefin now appears to have much more mercury.

In addition, another recent survey found "especially high levels among Asian New Yorkers, especially foreign-born Chinese, and people with high incomes. The report noted that Asians tend to eat more seafood…" The article omitted Japanese, Norwegians, and other populations which eat even more fish. Nor did it link mercury pollution in the sea to burning of coal, now the primary source, and that the United States emits about a quarter of the world by-product. Add to that our coal-burning contribution to climate change and potentially devastating effects of drought and flood on world food production, the rest of the world has right cause to criticize us.

So when do we start burning less coal?

{"commentId":1391762,"threadId":"207196","contentId":"1248022","authorDomain":"johnlam"}
    Reply#1 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:34 AM EST
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"207196","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"207196","contentId":"1248022"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking